Category 1: The Core Conflict (The 8GB VRAM Problem)
The 8GB VRAM Trap: Why New $300 GPUs Can’t Play New Games.
You just spent $300 on a brand-new graphics card, excited to play the latest releases. You fire up Monster Hunter Wilds at max settings, and the performance is a stuttering mess. This isn’t a faulty card; it’s the 8GB VRAM trap. Our tests show in some new games, an 8GB card can be less than half as fast, with a 119% performance loss compared to its 16GB sibling. This story explains how insufficient video memory creates a massive performance bottleneck, turning your exciting new purchase into an instant disappointment before you even get started.
Don’t Buy ANY 8GB Graphics Card in 2025 Until You See This.
This is a buyer’s advisory, a warning sign before you make a costly mistake. The story of 8GB graphics cards in 2025 is a story of compromise. Our head-to-head tests of the 9060 XT 8GB versus its 16GB version tell you everything. In many new games, especially at higher settings, the 8GB card’s performance doesn’t just dip; it falls off a cliff. We saw massive, game-breaking stutters and frame rate losses of over 30%. Before you add any 8GB card to your cart, see our charts that definitively show this performance collapse.
What a ‘VRAM Bottleneck’ Actually Looks Like (The 9060 XT 8GB vs. 16GB).
“VRAM bottleneck” is a technical term, but its effect is a simple story of frustration. Imagine a game running smoothly, then you turn a corner into a new area and it becomes an unplayable slideshow. That’s the VRAM cliff. Our sorted charts visualize this perfectly. You can see dozens of games running fine, tied with the 16GB card. Then, you see a sharp line where the 8GB card suddenly starts losing by 30%, 50%, even 100%. This visual explainer turns an abstract concept into a tangible problem you can see and avoid.
How Game Developers Are Making Your 8GB GPU Obsolete.
This is the story of a changing world. For years, 8GB of VRAM was the safe, mainstream choice. But in 2025, game developers are pushing boundaries with higher-resolution textures and more complex worlds. Our tests show this isn’t a one-off issue; it’s a trend. Game after game, especially the biggest releases of the year, demand more than 8GB to run smoothly at decent settings. Your graphics card isn’t getting slower; the games are getting bigger. This piece explores why your once-solid GPU is being left behind by modern game design.
The ‘Unusable Settings’ Lie: Why Max Settings Don’t Matter on a Budget GPU.
This is a story about realistic expectations. Many reviews test budget GPUs at “Ultra” settings, showing huge performance swings and declaring a winner. But if you’re buying a $300 card, you’re not playing at max settings anyway; the frame rates are too low to be enjoyable. We argue that the only tests that matter are at medium settings, where these cards are actually usable. Our 1080p Medium chart tells the true story, filtering out the “unusable” data to give you a real-world look at how these cards will actually perform for you.
The Hidden Bottleneck That’s Killing Your 8GB GPU (It’s Not Just VRAM).
The story of your stuttering gameplay has a hidden villain. When your 8GB card runs out of VRAM, it has to quickly pull data from your system’s main memory over the PCIe bus. But not all buses are created equal. The AMD 9060 XT uses a faster x16 connection, while the Nvidia 5060 uses a slower x8. This piece dives into that crucial difference, explaining how a slower connection acts like a narrow bridge during a traffic jam, making the already painful experience of a VRAM spillover even worse and compounding your performance problems.
Category 2: The $300 Showdown (AMD 9060 XT vs. Nvidia 5060)
I Tested the Two Cheapest New GPUs. The Winner Shocked Me.
The story starts simply: two $300 graphics cards, the AMD 9060 XT and the Nvidia 5060, enter the ring. At first glance, the data shows a 7% average win for AMD—not very exciting. But when I dug deeper into the realistic 1080p medium settings, a different story emerged. AMD didn’t just win; it won more often and by a more noticeable margin of around 10% in most of 2025’s biggest games. This narrative journey reveals how the real winner was hidden beneath the surface-level averages, a surprise that changed my entire perspective.
The $300 GPU Battle: Raw Power (AMD) vs. Smart Features (Nvidia).
This is the story of two different fighters with two different strategies. In one corner, you have AMD’s 9060 XT, a brawler with about 10% more raw performance in most realistic gaming scenarios. In the other, you have Nvidia’s 5060, a skilled technician with a superior feature set, including better DLSS upscaling available in more games and lower latency with Nvidia Reflex. This piece frames the choice for you: do you bet on the raw power of Team Red, or the smart, versatile toolkit of Team Green?
Why AMD and Nvidia Use VRAM So Differently.
This is a story of two competing philosophies. You and a friend both have 8GB cards, but in the same game, your AMD card stutters while their Nvidia card runs fine. Why? This piece explores the technical reasons behind this mystery. We dive into how AMD’s default use of Resizable BAR and different compression technologies can lead it to allocate more VRAM than Nvidia in the same situation. Understanding this difference is key to knowing why one card might tip over the 8GB edge while the other stays safely within its limits.
The Only Benchmark That Matters: 9060 XT vs. 5060 at 1080p Medium.
This is the story of finding clarity in a sea of data. After running dozens of tests at different resolutions and settings, one chart told the most honest story: 1080p Medium. This is the battlefield where these $300 cards will actually live and breathe. At these settings, VRAM issues are minimized, and you can see the true horsepower of each card. This focused analysis argues that if you’re deciding between the 9060 XT and the 5060, you can ignore almost everything else. This one chart is your crystal ball.
Is a 10% Performance Lead Worth Losing DLSS? The 9060 XT’s Big Problem.
This is a story about a difficult trade-off. The AMD 9060 XT is, on average, 10% faster than the Nvidia 5060 in real-world gaming. That sounds like an easy win. But what do you give up for that extra speed? You lose access to the superior image quality of DLSS4, which is also supported in far more games than AMD’s FSR4. This logical critique weighs that choice, asking a tough question: is a small boost in raw performance worth sacrificing a key feature that provides better visuals and wider game support?
When the 5060 Destroys the 9060 XT (And Why It Happens).
This is the story of the underdog’s surprise victory. In most tests, the AMD card holds a lead. But then you look at a game like Oblivion Remastered, and suddenly the Nvidia 5060 isn’t just winning; it’s 79% faster. This is no fluke. This deep dive explains that in games sitting right on the edge of the 8GB VRAM limit, Nvidia’s more efficient memory management becomes a superpower. It allows the 5060 to stay just inside the VRAM buffer, while the AMD card spills over and its performance collapses.
Category 3: The $350 Solution (The 16GB VRAM Argument)
Spend an Extra $50 Now, Save $300 Later: The 16GB VRAM Argument.
This is a story about financial foresight. You’re at a crossroads: buy the $300 8GB card now, or spend an extra $50 for the 16GB version at its $350 MSRP. Choosing the 8GB card feels like saving money today. But as our tests show, it’s already struggling with new games. This means you’ll likely need to buy another $300 card in just a year or two. This piece frames the 16GB card not as an expense, but as a smart investment in longevity that saves you from a future headache and another costly upgrade.
The $90 Question: Is the 16GB 9060 XT Really Worth 30% More Money?
This is the story of a tough pill to swallow. The 16GB 9060 XT is currently selling for $390, a full 30% more than the $300 8GB cards. But as our data shows, it’s not 30% faster in terms of raw power—in fact, the chip is identical. So what are you paying for? This data-driven analysis explains that you’re not buying more raw speed. You’re buying the removal of a massive headache. You’re paying to eliminate stutters, to not worry about VRAM, and to simply turn up your settings and play.
How Much Faster is the 16GB 9060 XT? The Answer is 0% and 119%.
This is a story told in a paradox. A potential buyer asks, “How much faster is the 16GB 9060 XT than the 8GB version?” The confusing but honest answer is that it’s both 0% faster and 119% faster. This piece explains that seeming contradiction. When a game uses less than 8GB of VRAM, the two cards are identical—0% faster. But the moment a game needs more, the 16GB card’s performance soars, delivering massive, game-changing gains. This title uses the data’s own puzzle to explain the unique value of VRAM.
Don’t Buy a GPU for 1440p Unless It Has 16GB of VRAM.
This is a story of a clear line in the sand. You just bought a beautiful 1440p monitor and need a new GPU. You might be tempted to save money with an 8GB card, but our tests deliver a definitive warning. Even when we turned games down to medium settings at 1440p, the 8GB cards frequently ran out of VRAM, causing significant performance issues. This guide uses that crucial data point as undeniable proof that in 2025, 8GB is simply not viable for a smooth 1440p gaming experience. 16GB is the new minimum.
The Real Price of the 16GB 9060 XT: $350 or $390?
This is a story about how $40 can change everything. The 16GB 9060 XT has a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of $350. At that price, it’s an easy recommendation—just a $50 jump from the 8GB cards. But right now, it’s selling for $390. This market-focused piece explores how that $40 “bad deal” tax completely alters the conversation. It turns an easy choice into a difficult one, forcing budget-conscious builders to reconsider the flawed 8GB options. It’s a look at how market pricing, not just performance, dictates the best value.
Category 4: For the PC Builder (Practical Advice & Scenarios)
Building a $1000 Gaming PC in 2025: Which of These GPUs Should You Buy?
This is the story of a common quest: building a great gaming PC on a $1000 budget. The graphics card is the heart of your build, but which one do you choose? Do you pick the faster raw performance of the 8GB 9060 XT, the feature-rich 8GB 5060, or do you stretch your budget for the safer 16GB 9060 XT and compromise on another component? This relatable scenario piece puts the GPU choice into the context of a full system, helping you make a balanced decision that’s right for your total build.
I Only Play Esports Titles. Do I Still Need 16GB of VRAM?
This is a story for the competitive gamer. You don’t play cinematic single-player games; you live in Valorant and Apex Legends. You care about frames per second and low latency, not ultra textures. Do you need to worry about the 8GB VRAM trap? This piece answers that specific question. It concludes that for most esports titles, which are designed to run on a wide range of hardware, an 8GB card is likely sufficient. In this case, the Nvidia 5060’s low-latency Reflex technology might even make it the smarter choice over a 16GB card.
You Just Bought an 8GB GPU. Here Are the 3 Settings You MUST Turn Down First.
This is a story for someone facing a tough reality. You’ve already bought an 8GB graphics card, and now you’re seeing that new games are stuttering. Don’t panic. This problem-solution guide is your first-aid kit. To get back to a smooth experience, the first three settings you should almost always turn down are texture quality, shadow quality, and view distance. These are the biggest VRAM hogs in modern games. This guide gives you actionable advice to make the best of the hardware you already own.
1080p Gamer vs. 1440p Gamer: A Completely Different GPU Recommendation.
This is the story of two different gamers with two different needs. One plays on a standard 1080p monitor, while the other has upgraded to a crisp 1440p display. Our data shows they should buy completely different graphics cards. This guide splits the recommendation, arguing that a 1080p gamer might be able to get by with a flawed 8GB card by turning down settings. But for the 1440p gamer, where even medium settings cause VRAM issues, the 16GB card isn’t just a recommendation; it’s a necessity.
How to Read a Benchmark Chart Like a Pro (And Not Get Fooled by Averages).
This is the story of becoming a smarter consumer. You see a GPU review that says “Card A is 7% faster than Card B” and you think you have your answer. But averages lie. This educational piece uses the review’s own charts as a case study. We teach you how to look beyond the simple geomean, why sorting the data is crucial, and how to spot the “VRAM cliff” for yourself. By the end, you’ll be able to read any benchmark chart like a pro and understand the true story behind the numbers.
Is Upscaling (DLSS/FSR) a Crutch for Underpowered GPUs?
This is a story about a philosophical debate in PC gaming. Technologies like DLSS and FSR give us “free” performance, but are they becoming a crutch? Are they allowing manufacturers to sell us underpowered hardware like these 8GB cards, knowing that upscaling can bail them out? This thought-provoking piece discusses how the heavy reliance on these technologies impacts the value proposition. It asks whether we’re celebrating innovation or enabling a future where GPUs can no longer handle games at their native resolution.
Category 5: Data-Driven Deep Dives
Mapping the VRAM Cliff: At What Exact Setting Does the 8GB Card Die?
This is a data-detective story. We know the 8GB graphics card fails when it runs out of VRAM, but where is the exact breaking point? This data-journalism piece dives deep into the charts, analyzing game by game. In Spider-Man 2, we see the “VRAM cliff” appears even at medium settings. In Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth, it only shows up at max. This investigation attempts to map the specific settings that push the 8GB card over the edge, giving you a precise understanding of its limits.
Why ‘Tied’ Performance Isn’t Really a Tie: Silicon Lottery & Run-to-Run Variance Explained.
This is a story about the hidden chaos in data. You look at a chart and see one GPU is 3% faster than another, so you declare it the winner. But it’s not that simple. This technical explainer focuses on those small, “less than 5% difference” results. We explain that what you’re actually seeing isn’t a true performance difference, but a combination of “run-to-run variance” and the “silicon lottery”—the tiny physical differences between two seemingly identical chips. It’s a lesson in the nuances of hardware testing.
A 7% Geomean Win: Why This Average Hides the Real Story of the 9060 XT.
This is the story of a misleading headline. The final average shows the AMD 9060 XT is 7% faster than the Nvidia 5060. But that single number hides a more dramatic narrative. This statistical breakdown explains why the geometric mean, while resistant to outliers, can flatten a complex story. We show how sorting the data reveals that in realistic scenarios, the 9060 XT’s wins are more frequent and often larger than 10%, a much more compelling case than the bland “7% faster” average suggests.
How Resizable BAR Creates a VRAM Difference Between AMD and Nvidia.
This is a story that goes deep into the technical weeds. Why does an AMD card often use more VRAM than an Nvidia card in the same game? One of the key suspects is Resizable BAR. This focused technical deep dive explains how this technology, which gives the CPU full access to the GPU’s memory, is enabled by default on AMD but only for specific “whitelisted” games on Nvidia. We explore the theory that this fundamental difference in approach impacts how memory is allocated, creating the VRAM usage gap you see in the tests.
The Power of a Better Upscaler: Quantifying the Value of DLSS4 over FSR4.
This is a story that tries to put a price on features. The AMD card is 10% faster, but the Nvidia card has the better upscaler, DLSS4. How do you compare raw speed to a better feature? This logical analysis attempts to quantify the value of Nvidia’s advantage. Since DLSS4 looks better and is in more games, we argue that this superior accessibility and image quality could be considered a “value” equivalent to a 10% or even 15% performance boost, potentially erasing AMD’s lead entirely for many users.
Category 6: Out-of-the-Box & Emotional Angles
Why It’s So Hard to be a PC Gamer on a Budget in 2025.
This is the story of a frustrating hobby. You want to build a gaming PC without breaking the bank, but every choice feels like a trap. This GPU comparison is a perfect case study. The $300 cards are already struggling with new games due to low VRAM. The card that’s actually future-proof costs nearly $400. This emotional editorial captures the collective sigh of the budget PC building community, highlighting a market where entry-level options feel designed to disappoint, making it harder than ever to get started in the hobby.
My Final Verdict: I Can’t Recommend Either $300 Graphics Card.
This is the story of an honest reviewer pushed to a difficult conclusion. After analyzing dozens of charts and weighing all the pros and cons, the final verdict is one of frustration. I can’t, in good conscience, recommend the 8GB 9060 XT because its VRAM is too low. And I can’t recommend the 8GB 5060 because it’s slower and still has too little VRAM. This bold, opinionated take argues that the budget market is broken, and my only real advice is to reject both options and try to save more money.
Is the GPU Industry Lying to You About ‘Entry-Level’?
This is a story about a potential betrayal of trust. Companies are marketing new 8GB graphics cards as great “entry-level” options for 1080p gaming. But as our data from 2025’s biggest games clearly shows, these cards can’t consistently handle new titles even at medium settings. This critical piece asks a tough question: is selling a product that is already on the verge of obsolescence a disservice to customers? Is the industry setting up new PC builders for a poor experience right from the start?
The Psychology of MSRP: Why a $350 GPU Feels So Much Better Than a $390 One.
This is a story about how your brain perceives price. The 16GB 9060 XT is the clear winner, but the recommendation hinges on its price. At its $350 suggested retail price, it’s an easy choice. At its current $390 street price, it’s a difficult one. Why does that $40 difference feel so significant? This out-of-the-box piece looks at the consumer psychology of pricing anchors and perceived value, explaining how a 17% price jump feels reasonable, while a 30% jump feels like a ripoff, even if the dollar amount is small.
The Most Honest GPU Review You’ll See This Year.
In a world of definitive “Best GPU” proclamations, this is the story of a refreshingly honest conclusion: “It’s complicated, and I’m not sure.” This piece frames the review’s nuanced, data-driven, and slightly confused verdict not as a weakness, but as a strength. It’s a true reflection of a messy and flawed budget GPU market where there are no easy answers. This title champions the review’s transparency and its refusal to declare a simple winner where one doesn’t truly exist.
What Your Choice Between AMD and Nvidia Says About You as a Gamer.
This is a story that turns a hardware choice into a personality test. Are you a “raw performance purist” who will always choose the card with the highest potential frame rate, even if it means giving up some bells and whistles? If so, the 9060 XT is for you. Or are you a “pragmatic technician” who values a rich feature set, better upscaling, and low-latency tools over a small speed advantage? Then you’re on Team 5060. This fun, personality-driven piece frames the difficult choice in a relatable way.
Category 7: Answering Specific User Questions
What’s a ‘Realistic’ Experience on a New $300 GPU?
The story of your new $300 graphics card in 2025 is one of managing expectations. A “realistic” experience means you’ll be a 1080p gamer, and you will become very familiar with the settings menu. In most of the biggest new games, you will need to turn textures and other settings down to medium to stay within your 8GB of VRAM and avoid stuttering. You will have a good experience, but you must accept that “Ultra” settings are not part of your story.
Should I Buy the 9060 XT 8GB or Save Up for the 16GB Version?
This is the story of a short-term saving versus a long-term investment. Buying the 8GB card saves you about $90 today. But our tests show it’s already hitting its VRAM limit in many 2025 games. Saving up for the 16GB version buys you peace of mind. It’s the difference between constantly tweaking settings to avoid stutters and simply playing the game. If you can afford it, especially if it’s near its $350 MSRP, saving up is the smarter story for a stress-free gaming future.
Will I Notice a 10% Performance Difference in Real Gameplay?
The story of a 10% performance difference is subtle but significant. In a game running at 60 frames per second on the Nvidia 5060, the AMD 9060 XT would be running at around 66 FPS. Will your eyes notice that specific jump? Maybe not. But you will feel it. That 10% is an extra buffer that keeps your frame rate smoother and more consistent, especially during intense action. It’s the difference between a game feeling consistently smooth and a game that has occasional, noticeable dips.
Which Card is Better if I Refuse to Use Upscaling?
This is the story of a gaming purist. You want to play every game at its native resolution, with no upscaling involved. In this scenario, raw performance is all that matters. Since the AMD 9060 XT is consistently about 10% faster than the Nvidia 5060 when VRAM isn’t an issue, it becomes the clear winner for you. You are trading away Nvidia’s superior DLSS feature, but since you don’t plan to use it anyway, you might as well take the card with more horsepower for your native-resolution gameplay.
Is It a Mistake to Pair an 8GB GPU with a 1440p Monitor?
The short story is: yes, in 2025, it is likely a mistake. Our tests tell a cautionary tale. We found that even when we turned games down to medium settings at 1440p, the 8GB graphics cards frequently ran out of video memory, leading to major performance problems. While it might work for older or less demanding titles, for the big new releases, you will be fighting a constant, frustrating battle against your VRAM limit. A 1440p monitor really deserves a card with 16GB of VRAM.
How Often Will I Actually Have to Turn Down Settings with an 8GB Card?
The story of owning an 8GB card in 2025 is a story of frequent trips to the settings menu. Based on our testing of the year’s biggest new games, you should expect to turn down settings, particularly texture quality, in the majority of them. While you won’t have to turn every game down to medium, you will almost never be able to run a new AAA title at “Ultra” without issues. It’s a constant balancing act to stay within that 8GB VRAM buffer.
Does the 5060’s Better Frame Generation Make Up for its Lower FPS?
This is a story of two different kinds of speed. The 9060 XT gives you a higher base frame rate. The 5060 can use its superior frame generation to create even more frames, but they add latency and aren’t “real.” For a single-player cinematic game, many would argue yes—the smoother motion from Nvidia’s frame generation can feel better. But for a fast-paced competitive game where responsiveness is key, the higher native FPS of the AMD card is more valuable. The answer depends entirely on the story of the game you’re playing.
If I Buy an 8GB Card, How Long Before I Need to Upgrade Again?
This is a story about a short lifespan. If you buy an 8GB graphics card today, you are buying a product that is already at its limit. Based on the trend of increasing VRAM usage in new games, it is very likely that you will feel the need to upgrade within one to two years. You’ll find that by 2026 or 2027, a significant number of new games will be nearly unplayable without making major visual sacrifices. The 16GB card, by contrast, tells a much longer story.
Can Modding (Optoscaler) Fix the 9060 XT’s Weaker Upscaling?
This is the story of a community solution to a corporate problem. The 9060 XT is faster, but its FSR upscaling isn’t as good or as widely supported as Nvidia’s DLSS. Can mods like Optoscaler, which can add DLSS support to games, fix this? The answer is: sometimes. While modding is a powerful tool, it’s a hassle, doesn’t work in every game, and can get you banned from online multiplayer titles. It’s a potential fix, but it’s not the clean, reliable solution that native DLSS support provides.
For Streaming and Content Creation, is the 5060 the Obvious Choice?
Yes, this is a story where one card has a clear advantage. If your goal is not just gaming, but also streaming or video editing, the Nvidia 5060 is almost certainly the better choice. Nvidia’s CUDA technology is the industry standard for professional applications, offering much better support and performance in programs like Adobe Premiere and DaVinci Resolve. Furthermore, Nvidia’s NVENC encoder is widely considered superior for live streaming. For creators, these features are often more valuable than a small in-game performance lead.
I Found a 9060 XT 16GB for $350. Is it an Instant Buy?
Yes, this is the story of a golden opportunity. As our analysis showed, the main hesitation with the 16GB 9060 XT was its inflated $390 price tag. If you find it at its suggested retail price of $350, it becomes the clear and definitive winner in this entire comparison. At that price, you are only paying a small premium (about 17%) over the flawed 8GB cards to get double the VRAM and complete peace of mind for years to come. It’s not just a good deal; it’s the smartest buy you can make.
Is AMD’s PCIe x16 Advantage a Real-World Benefit over Nvidia’s x8?
This is a story about a problem you hope to never have. AMD’s faster PCIe x16 connection is only a benefit when your card runs out of VRAM and has to access system memory. So, is it a real-world advantage? Yes, but it’s like having a better seatbelt. It will make the “crash” of a VRAM spillover slightly less painful than on the Nvidia x8 card. However, the real goal should be to not crash at all. The smarter choice is to buy a card with enough VRAM (like the 16GB model) so you never have to rely on this feature.
What is the Best Graphics Card Under $400 in 2025?
This is the story of a clear winner emerging from a messy battle. If your budget can stretch just under the $400 mark, the best choice is unquestionably the 16GB version of the AMD 9060 XT, especially if you can find it for its $350 MSRP. It completely avoids the VRAM issues that plague the other two cards, offering enough raw performance and memory to provide a smooth, headache-free gaming experience in new titles at both 1080p and 1440p. It is the only card in this comparison that feels truly built for 2025.
Why Does My AMD Card Use More VRAM Than My Friend’s Nvidia Card?
This is the story of a behind-the-scenes technical difference. You and your friend are playing the same game, but your AMD card’s VRAM usage is higher. It’s not a bug; it’s by design. AMD and Nvidia have different philosophies for memory management. AMD cards tend to have features like Resizable BAR enabled by default and use different data compression, which can lead them to proactively allocate more VRAM. This doesn’t always mean worse performance, but it can push them over the 8GB edge more easily than their Nvidia counterparts.
If I Play Online Shooters, Does Nvidia Reflex Make the 5060 the Winner?
This is a story where features trump raw speed. If your main goal is to be competitive in online shooters, then yes, the Nvidia 5060 likely becomes the winner for you. Nvidia’s Reflex technology, which is designed to reduce system latency, is available in far more esports titles than AMD’s competing Anti-Lag 2. In games where a millisecond can mean the difference between winning and losing a gunfight, the lower input lag provided by Reflex is a more valuable advantage than the 9060 XT’s slightly higher average frame rate.
The Final Verdict is ‘Make Your Own Call’. How Do I Do That?
This is the story of empowering yourself to make the final choice. To “make your own call,” you need to ask yourself three questions. First, what is my absolute maximum budget? If you can afford the 16GB card, the story ends there. Second, what games do I play? If it’s mostly esports, Nvidia’s features might be better. If it’s single-player games, AMD’s raw power is tempting. Third, how much do I hate tweaking settings? If you want to set it and forget it, save up for more VRAM. Answering these defines your own personal best choice.